Class Action vs Individual Lawsuit for the Barry Brock Case

‍

I saw the case on the news, and I might be involved. Do I join a class action or file for myself?

Great question!

‍

As litigation continues over the alleged misconduct of gynecologist Dr Barry J Brock, survivors often ask whether they should join a class action lawsuit or pursue their own case. It’s a perfectly valid question.

Under California law, this choice is crucial because the allegations, the impact, institutional responsibility (hospital’s negligence), and the relief sought (your settlement) will vary from person to person. 

McGrath Kavinoky LLP is working closely with survivors to explain these differences and to show why an individual lawsuit may offer stronger opportunities for accountability and compensation.

In this article, we take a quick look at class action vs individual lawsuits, evaluate the risks, and determine how McGrath Kavinoky LLP can help you understand the best option.

‍

Class Action Lawsuits Under California Law

A class action lawsuit permits one or more plaintiffs to sue on behalf of a larger group of similarly situated people. In other words, you all went through a similar event. 

Under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 382, a person may sue or defend for “the benefit of all,” when there is a common interest of many persons, and it is impracticable to bring all before the court. 

You can only file a class action if the requirements of the class are met, as laid out in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 23(a):

‍

1. The class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable

2. There are questions of law or fact common to the class

3. The claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class

4. The representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.

In many mass-harm scenarios, class actions provide efficiencies: discovery can be centralized, litigation costs can be shared among many claimants, and claims can be resolved collectively rather than individually.

However, class action status also imposes some limitations. Class members typically surrender decision-making control, may receive small per-person compensation when large classes share a single recovery, and cannot tailor claims to their specific damages.

‍

Individual Lawsuits in the Barry Brock Matter

An individual lawsuit, on the other hand, allows one claimant to pursue relief tailored to the specific facts of their case: their own injuries, the physician’s conduct toward them, the institution’s response relevant to them, and their unique damages. 

In the context of Dr. Brock, where each patient’s experience may differ in timing, the nature of the alleged misconduct, the harm suffered, and the institutional response, an individualized approach often enables a full evaluation of one’s rights under California law.

Your own lawsuit means legal theories are tailored to your experience, without being constrained by a broader class. This can include:

• Sexual assault or battery
• Invasion of privacy
• Negligent hiring
• Supervision or retention by the hospital

Because the claim is only about you, the attorney can more aggressively pursue evidence specific to your treatment, the physician’s conduct toward you, the hospital’s handling of complaints, and the resultant damages.

Individual vs Class Action Lawsuit

Quick Comparison for Survivors

‍

Why Individual Lawsuits May Better Serve Clients in the Brock Case

Variability of Harm and Facts

Many former patients of Dr. Brock report similar behaviors, but no two experiences are the same. Facts will vary, like:

• Your appointment date
• The type of exam you received
• Whether a chaperone was present
• What the hospital may have known at the time 
• The emotional or medical impact on you personally 

These are all unique factors that can’t be ignored.  When everyone is grouped in a single class action, key differences can be lost, leading to a one-size-fits-all settlement that treats everyone the same—even when some survivors experienced more severe or distinct harm.

Control of Litigation Strategy and Outcome

Class actions place many claimants behind lead plaintiffs and require court certification, often leaving individual claimants with limited input about settlement decisions, litigation strategy, or selection of counsel. This means your voice may not be heard as loudly as you think it will in a class action. You are one of many people with the same problem. 

Pursuing an individual lawsuit ensures that the claimant works directly with counsel, like McGrath Kavinoky LLP, who will prioritize your experience, protect confidentiality, and focus on maximizing individual recovery, rather than lumping you as one of many in a class.

Clear Link to Institutional Liability

Since concerns about Cedars-Sinai’s oversight and response come up in these cases, an individual lawsuit allows your legal team to look closely at what happened around your own treatment. This can include details like:

• Hospital credentialing
• Past complaints
• Supervision practices
• Staff awareness at the time of your appointment. 

These details matter to proving institutional responsibility. In a class action, your facts can get diluted because the case focuses on what’s common to everyone, rather than what happened to you personally.

Maximizing Compensation for Serious Harm

Many survivors of Dr Brock describe long-lasting emotional, psychological, or medical effects. An individual lawsuit allows the court to consider the full scope of your harm and pursue compensation that reflects your specific experience. 

In class actions, the settlement fund is divided among many people, which often leads to smaller payments and formulas that do not account for deeper or more complex trauma. For those who suffered significant harm, an individualized approach offers a better path to meaningful recovery. 

Evaluating the Certification Risks and Requirements

Under California class action rules, a class must show that everyone had nearly identical experiences and shared legal issues. In the Dr. Brock case, each patient’s care occurred at different times, under different circumstances, and with varying levels of institutional knowledge. 

Defendants may challenge class certification on those grounds, which can delay the entire case or reduce the chances of a win. Meaning, if you’re in a class, and the defense challenges that status, your case is going to drag on even longer.

‍

By bringing an individual claim, survivors avoid these certification risks and the long wait times that come with them. Your case moves forward based on the facts, not on whether a judge agrees to certify an entire class.

How McGrath Kavinoky LLP Works in the Individual Lawsuit Path

McGrath Kavinoky LLP focuses on the unique stories of survivors who believe they were harmed by Dr. Brock and affected by Cedars-Sinai’s oversight failures. Their approach includes:

• A private, confidential evaluation of your experience by a female attorney who can help decide whether an individual lawsuit is the strongest path.
  
• Evidence gathering that centers on your specific treatment. This can include medical records and credentialing documents, hospital complaint history, and potential witnesses.
  
• A legal strategy designed around your personal claims, including physician misconduct and any negligence in supervision, hiring, or response from the hospital.
  
• Clear communication throughout the process, with you in control of major decisions and contingency representation, so you only pay if recovery is achieved.

This individualized path ensures that your voice, your harm, and your rights stay at the center of the case, rather than lost in a large group settlement.

Practical Steps for Survivors Considering Their Options

Survivors exploring their rights under California law may want to think about:

• Whether the claimant’s harm is distinct and deserves tailored legal attention.
• The extent of emotional, medical, or psychological damages they have endured.
• Their preference for personal control, privacy, and a more trauma-informed process.
• The timing of filing, including California’s laws on sexual misconduct claims and extended discovery windows.
• Whether institutional records connected to their specific care support a strong individualized claim.

Working with a firm that focuses on individual representation, like McGrath Kavinoky LLP, helps survivors make a more informed choice about how to proceed. It’s having someone looking out for your best interests when other institutions have failed you.

‍

What’s Next?

Survivors of Dr. Barry J. Brock must make an important decision: pursue a class action or file an individual lawsuit. 

While class actions work well when everyone’s experience is nearly identical, they are often less effective when the details, harm, and context differ from person to person (which is typically the case). 

Individual lawsuits offer more control, greater privacy, and the opportunity for compensation that reflects the full impact of what you had to endure. They can be faster, more relevant to your needs, and offer higher amounts of compensation. 

If you were harmed under Dr Brock’s care, you do not need to move forward as part of a large class. You can bring your own claim, with personalized advocacy and a dedicated legal team standing beside you every step of the way. Reach out today and speak with a female attorney about your concerns. 

‍